Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concord Block

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Types of public housing estate blocks in Hong Kong. ✗plicit 23:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concord Block

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Concord Block (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The houses aren’t notable, I have tried speedily deleting this article but it was removed. The article is not sourced properly and there is lots of unsourced paragraphs. The only sources are primary sources (housing authority, floor plans, etc). Just because they have a Wikipedia article in Chinese it doesn’t automatically make it notable for the English Wikipedia. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support deleting the article or merging it to Types of public housing estate blocks in Hong Kong. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30-Story Cruciform Block. The article seems to be in the same style as that article, down to the references used - I wouldn't be surprised if they were created by the same person. BilledMammal (talk) 06:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (selective) > Types of public housing estate blocks in Hong Kong Djflem (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Types of public housing estate blocks in Hong Kong.4meter4 (talk) 15:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Types of public housing estate blocks in Hong Kong.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.