Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conditioning shampoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shampoo. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conditioning shampoo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not hair advice, should been redirected to Shampoo. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 01:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Shampoo which mentions products contains conditioner (though most mentions are for animals, go figure) so is a plausible search term. I'd say Speedy Redirect if that was a thing. Perhaps this topic warrants an article but the one presenting here ain't it. Crow^Caw 01:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shampoo. This is not a neutral encyclopedia article, but rather an unreferenced personal essay attacking a product category. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shampoo per above. Chase (talk) 02:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.