Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conecture Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conecture Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a company that does not have the significant coverage needed in independent reliable sources to meet notability criteria. The article is sourced to press releases / press release rehash. My own search finds no reliable sources covering this company. Whpq (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 16:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. The bulk of the article is pure advertising: unreferenced text describing the capabilities of this business's intangible products, as usual written in gibberish: The company is best recognized for its hosted solutions, Mediabox-PA for online product approvals workflow and Mediabox-DAM for digital asset management and delivery, focused exclusively for the Consumer Products Licensing, Brand Management and Media & Entertainment (TV Distribution/Broadcasting) industries. The "references" catalogue appearances of this business at trade shows, and that would not appear to be a subminimal assertion of importance, much less the significant independent coverage in reliable sources. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.