Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conformation Absentiality Chaos Factor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 02:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conformation Absentiality Chaos Factor

Difficult to tell what this article is about but it is something in the social sciences. Pure hoax. Google knows nothing about it. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete At best, original research. No evidence the concept has any currency in social science. Edison (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This has been dumped into Wikinews as well. A hoax. GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was just about to note the same thing as GeorgeLouis. A hoaxer has once again made it easy for us by including a citation. In this case the citation points to volume #1 of a periodical named "Social Sciences and the World", published in 2007. I can find no evidence that any such periodical exists. This is a hoax. Uncle G (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's already been up four days too long. GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a hoax, even social scientists don't write quite this badly - I wonder if it was written by one of those postmodernism generator programs? Anyway, even the author admits "CACF is not well-documented". JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. RogueNinja_talk 16:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.