Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confusing riddles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. Resolute 03:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing riddles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Totally inappropriate information for an encyclopaedia. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- non-notable, non-encyclopedic --mhking (talk) 23:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - borderline nonsense. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 23:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete --G1: nonsense and you can probably argue that A1 also applies. --Sophitessa (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Speedy Delete Patent nonsense. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 02:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.