- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Conjure Cognac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable beverage riding on Ludacris' coattails but apparently receiving no publicity. Orange Mike | Talk 03:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No signs of notability. In the alcoholic beverage area, I would require significant third-party coverage to consider a single product/a brand notable enough for an article separate from that of the producer. Tomas e (talk) 10:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very slight news coverage reads like press releases. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.