Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connexn Technologies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Note that the page Azure Solutions was also speedy deleted per WP:CORP as a result of this AfD as these two pages only referered to each other. —Doug Bell talk 22:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Connexn Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No establishment of notability per WP:CORP. Also a WP:RS failure. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 11:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 01:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom, and it reads like a biography. Iced Kola(Mmm...) 01:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:CORP. MER-C 02:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP -- Selmo (talk) 02:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. on camera 15:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per db-corp. Not seeing assertion of notability anywhere. JuJube 23:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:CORP; where's assertion of notablility? Tuvok ^ Talk | Desk | Contribs 12:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.