Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice towards speedy recreation if there's news that he meets NFOOTBALL. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conor Washington

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD contested by the author without providing a reason. – Michael (talk) 18:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage in reliable sources, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Walls of Jericho (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He appears to play for a League Two club, all of whose current squad (except one) have articles. That looks notable to me, but I do not know football and do not vote on it. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He hasn't played a fully pro league match nor has he capped for a senior national team. Therefore, he's still not notable. – Michael (talk) 23:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incubate It's highly likely that this player will meet WP:NFOOTY in August. There seems to be little point in letting the effort that's put into this article thus far go to waste (cf. WP:DEMOLISH). A keep may even be appropriate per WP:IAR. --BDD (talk) 19:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable yet, as he fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, and we don't know if he will play once the season starts in August. The effort wont go to waste as the article can be recreated with a click of a buttom once he becomes notable. Mentoz86 (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on who's making the article. An experienced user will probably know to contact an administrator to have this page restored. A less experienced user might just make a new article. --BDD (talk) 15:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.