Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor and Jay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conor and Jay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to see how this group passes Wp:MUSIC - their only claim to fame is that they've done songs that have appeared in a few of the Grand Theft Auto games. (Sidenote - it's been tagged as possibly not meeting the notability guidelines since August 2008.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 23:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Searched using "Conor and Jay" as well as "Conor & Jay"; could find only trivial mentions on GTA-related fansites, forums, etc. No significant coverage, does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Gongshow ^Talk 01:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of touring internationally or otherwise passing WP:BAND. Bearian (talk) 01:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't appear to satisfy WP:BAND, and I don't think the GTA appearances merit inclusion as it's really rather trivial significance, I feel. Cocytus [»talk«] 05:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, being known solely for game music makes these people subject to WP:BLP1E. Nyttend (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.