Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquerors Divine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per CSD A9 by User:JamieS93. Non-admin closure. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 23:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Conquerors Divine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:N. Individual album articles for this band are not notable until someone creates a full article for the band itself, which would then establish some amount of notability. There is little or no notability now. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The creator of these articles is doing it backwards, and needs to follow the nom's advice. First start with the band, then we can talk about keeping albums based on the band's merits. Until then, no go. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Independent album article not warranted at this time; band's notability not established. Gongshow Talk 18:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: db-album. Joe Chill (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.