Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consequence of Sound
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 July 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BJTalk 19:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Consequence of Sound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable music website, fails WP:WEB. TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A couple sources, but not enough to get over notability guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Appears to be notable enough to warrant inclusion. But more substantial coverage would be better. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Substantial coverage from where? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 09:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Weak keep?!! Totally non-notable, no reliable third-party sources, not owned by a notable company, doesn't have writers who have been published elsewhere reliable, doesn't even have a submissions guideline page. Let's keep the standards up, guys. Control says Halt! and Delete. Rafablu88 06:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.