Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consequences of Feminization of Labor: in California
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Usersification may be requested at WP:REFUND. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Consequences of Feminization of Labor: in California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be Original Research. The original seconded PROD was removed by author. reddogsix (talk) 02:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 19:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Original research, reads like an essay, references are weak (thus unlikely to support a re-write) LaMona (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Carolyngenesis should be proud of their thesis paper, but this isn't the place for it. I do hope they make sure to recycle the useable links/books and research on related topics. Earflaps (talk) 15:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. Just because it isn't an appropriate WP article doesn't mean it isn't good content. Thanks for making that point. LaMona (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as an original essay. Userfy if the creator wants it, I suspect there may be material to be mined here for existing coverage of sweat shops or wage theft, etc. This is not an encyclopedic topic, which is not to say it is an unimportant matter. Carrite (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.