Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitutional monarchy with autocratic reserve powers
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 21:41, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Too short and very unnecesary. The fact that there is no name for this sort of government other than a long term that sums it up shows that it's not needed to have its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.123.220.103 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 08:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. TheMadBaron 10:46, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The title is not commonly used either in political science or in the wider community. The Constitutional monarchy deals with the topic of constitutional monarchs in authoritarian systems in greater depth. Our Reserve power article is detailed and outlines countries where the ruler has reserve powers including republics. Contrary to claims in the article, Roman emperors were not constitutional monarchs nor did they have reserve powers although ir could be argued that the tradition of giving Republican leaders 6 months dictatorial status in event of an invasion or war was a reserve power. Capitalistroadster 11:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in agreement with CR. No significant content other than what could be inferred from the title. Appears to be original research, with no citations. Barno 00:01, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.