Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitutional violation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Constitutional violation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neogilism. The original creator removed a prod. I suppose people say "constitutional violation" as a noun occasionally, but it's not a legal concept, and it wouldn't be said in those terms.
The Cornell link is to the law school's page, and there is a single reference to apatheticvoter.com
This smells to me as a POV article, not a valid topic. Shadowjams (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article clearly exists to promote a political viewpoint, and I can't see how an encyclopaedic article could be developed under this title. EALacey (talk) 11:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as this is a political essay inappropriate for Wikipedia. Andrea105 (talk) 00:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not for personal essays. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom.--Karljoos (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.