- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Constructicons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable group of fictional characters- no significant coverage in independent reliable sources (fails WP:GNG). Blest Withouten Match (talk) 17:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure about deleting this. The Constructicons are less obscure than the characters I nominated for deletion. Really, there's lots more obvious deletion candidates than this. NotARealWord (talk) 17:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Definite keep but get rid of the fancruft, fansites and better sourcing. Dwanyewest (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this one is a common group known just about everywhere. The nominator has been very silly today. Mathewignash (talk) 22:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable character within the Transformers franchise, which appeared in the toyline, cartoon, comic books, and film. BOZ (talk) 23:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTE The nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Claritas. Mathewignash (talk) 09:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep as a sockpuppet nomination by Claritas (talk · contribs). No prejudices against renomination after a week to give time for the other butt-load of Transformers AfDs to worth themselves through, which may give guidance on what to do with this article. —Farix (t | c) 23:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.