Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constructive Sovereignty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The Result was Speedy Delete. --Ave Caesar (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive Sovereignty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete non notable political theory. Primarily original research. The article was created by the person who seems to purport this theory thus constituting a conflict of interest. Even the article itself classifies it as an "emerging theory." Ave Caesar (talk) 04:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - just because someone comes up with some new idea doesn't mean it's worth writing an article about... the original author of this article has also created wiki articles for his books. All have been speedy'd at least once for copyvio. Compplete OR gibberish if you ask me... - Adolphus79 (talk) 04:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NEO. YrPolishUncle (talk) 13:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete spam. Maybe delete the user page on the same basis. If anyone other than Mr. Maszka is impressed by his ideas, he's successfully obscured it with his endless blog spam. WillOakland (talk) 22:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.