Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConsumerBase LLC (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ConsumerBase LLC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable company. Sources seem to be almost all press releases or newspaper republications of press releases. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Let us try searching for sources using the termConsumerBase. ConsumerBase LLC is the company name, but it is widely known as ConsumerBase not as ConsumerBase LLC. I know that the article was deleted four years ago, but it is 2012. I am sure we can find notable sources to prove this articles notability. (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)--Renzoy16 | Contact Me 14:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment is from the creator and sole contributor to the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Another provider of multi-channel direct marketing services with a specialty in postal, email, and telephone solutions advertising on Wikipedia. Spam promoting a spammer. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question, is PRweb.com's news articles not notable?--Renzoy16 | Contact Me 11:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PRweb is, like the name says, an aggregation of public relations material. Pretty much nothing there is going to be a truly independent source. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Entirely sourced from the company's own press releases issued via PRweb, plus a listing by Bloomsberg BW. No in-depth, reliable, independent sources, fails notability criteria. Sionk (talk) 23:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.