Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumer Action Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consumer Action Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G11. Unequivocally does not meet WP:NORG as there is no coverage outside of their own website. Note that this page almost certainly has WP:NPOV issues based on the edit history and has been sitting here since 2007. Kylemahar902 (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Strictly promotional input from a one-time-only editor. — Maile (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Local organization of only local note (note the first result on Google without adding "-DC" is for an unrelated group asking for the removal of remaining blue laws). Nate • (chatter) 22:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources of any sort. Does not meet WP:GNG. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are a few sources that verify its existence, and I saw an obituary of the founder, but they do not constitute significant coverage. Self-efficacy for consumers of behavioral health care is important, but that's not our charitable mission. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom ,,Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:47, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.