Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Containment theory records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 01:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Containment theory records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable record label. Advert/spam, only source is from MySpace. Lugnuts 17:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Appears to be non-notable Deli nk 18:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 19:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• speedy delete as spam per Lugnuts! Precious lugnuts! How did you find all these to delete, btw? Did you find a useful search string? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Reply In part of my cleanup of all the record labels, I sometimes browse Category:Category needed and then the most recent full month - IE Category:Uncategorized from July 2007. I then just do a text search for the word "record" in the article titles in that category. There's usually a fair few in each month. A handful are good articles that just need a bit of a cleanup, but the vast majority are in the advert/spam bracket, and I AFD them. Or maybe I should use my What-If machine... Lugnuts 17:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.