Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continuous Call Team network stations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 04:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous Call Team network stations

Nominated because Wikipedia is Not a Directory. Todd661 03:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If it belongs anywhere at WP (and I'm doubtful of that), it belongs in the main article. Otherwise, WP is not a directory. Realkyhick 05:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--not only is WP not a directory, but such a list could be done for every radio or television program. An article of a film could have a list of every theater where it played. An article on a recording could have a list of every station that aired it. DGG 07:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DaveApter 09:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Thewinchester ^(talk) 05:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Thewinchester ^(talk) 05:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WWIN Kntrabssi 05:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Networks like Austereo or Macquarie merit lists of this type, but not radio stations carrying a particular segment. (Imagine "How Green Was My Cactus network stations"...) Orderinchaos 08:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OIC, How I long for something as funny as How Green was my Cactus, or perhaps an updated version of Guru Swami... who constantly hit everyone over the head with a sitar player. -- Thewinchester ^(talk) 09:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pure trivia. Lankiveil 13:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.