Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contrablonial

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --malathion ^talk 06:07, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense - unfortunately I don't think patent nonsense (although I won't object) --Doc (?) 22:45, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Patent enough that I would've {{nonsense}}d it. Anyway, if the broken English doesn't convince you, zero googles might. —Cryptic (talk) 22:55, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the nonsense per google. feydey 23:21, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, speedy wouldn't hurt either. Punkmorten 23:34, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Pavel Vozenilek 02:31, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, patent nonsense, neologism. ManoaChild 03:51, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.