Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contractor progress payment schedule
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Construction management. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Contractor progress payment schedule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if this can qualify as an individual article. Maybe a merge would be appropriate? Josh1024 (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly merge/redirect to Payment schedule, but delete if deemed inappropriate (I can't find any other targets). Ansh666 18:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]Okay, then keep and move per Cullen below. Ansh666 05:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Okay, I'm officially very confused. Ansh666 17:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- merge and redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and move to "Contractor progress payment". A Google search under this slightly broader title shows that the topic is widely discussed in U.S. law regarding major construction contracts. As a licensed contractor for 26 years, I know the importance and notability of this topic. The suggested redirect article has nothing whatsoever to do with this topic. This is not a financial instrument, it is a regularly scheduled payment for performance of a long term contract, based on meeting predefined benchmarks. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No, don't call it a "contractor progress payment". The same thing has other names in other countries. Here in the UK it would be called a "stage payment" or an "interim payment", and if you said "contractor progress payment" people wouldn't know what you were talking about. I agree the concept, in relation to building projects, should be covered on Wikipedia. To me, the encyclopaedic topic and the obvious merge target is construction management, an article that appears to be in need of quite a bit of development in other ways.—S Marshall T/C 11:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete / merge to Construction management, little more than a dicdef. Hairhorn (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.