Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contractor screening
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SpinningSpark 13:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Contractor screening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little encyclopedic content, largely a listing of US-specific practices and regulations. Previous copypaste issues that may or may not be resolved. Anything salvageable in here is covered elsewhere, at pages such as background check. Hairhorn (talk) 13:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Somebody's essay, expresses POV. Sources aren't there for this as a notable concept. - MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge with background check. Many google books sources for this, such as [1], [2], [3]. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there anything in the entry that's worth merging? i don't see it. Hairhorn (talk) 03:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NOTHOWTO. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.