- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:24, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No google hits on "Rodents in Paris", only contribution by this editor (Aug 2005), suspect hoax RJFJR 19:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete obvious hoax/nonsense. -- Kicking222 22:35, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Mailer Diablo 06:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mailer Diablo 06:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above. --Eivindt@c 07:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Does any of this exist ? -- Simon Cursitor 07:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax, unverifiable. --Terence Ong 08:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- unverifiable.--blue520 09:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unverifiable, orphaned, and probably a hoax. - Richardcavell 09:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. PJM 12:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Mystache 13:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. I've wikified it just it case it stays. --Tango 16:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.