Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversation Generation Rate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation Generation Rate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The link begins, "Allow me to introduce a brand new..." I stopped right there, per WP:NFT. - Dank (push to talk) 21:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 21:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:CB. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looking through the history makes me doubtful about this subject. DDDtriple3 (talk) 05:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Also, likely coatrack spam: a performance measure used to evaluate the effectiveness of an online marketing campaign and/or to compare the effectiveness of a number of different marketing campaigns. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Product promotion. 71.3.53.121 (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)^{User:71.3.53.121 made 19 WP:JUSTAVOTE and WP:JNN AfD recommendations in less than 30 minutes after being templated as a single-purpose account on WP:Articles for deletion/Chain smoking — Rankiri (talk) 16:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.