Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooking With Catie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cooking With Catie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NN cookbook and. No G-hits for news - only shop sites or promotional sites. Failed {{prod}} when sole author (with COI) objected.

This is also great example of why Wikipedia needs a speedy deletion criterion for articles about products that do not assert a product's importance. Toddst1 (talk) 16:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found no coverage that would make this pass WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and agreed- we need a speedy delete for articles about non-notable products. There's nothing about this book that is notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.