- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CorEnt Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero refs. Zero gnews hits. Zero non-wiki gbooks hits. Tagged for zero refs for over a year. Created by a 1-article-only-ever SPA, whose name suggests a possible conflict of interest. Epeefleche (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:PROMO, appears to not satisfy WP:CORP. After a brief online search I found [1] but the company isn't the subject of that article. Refs in Korean may exist but no one has been inclined so far to seek them and include in the article. -- Trevj (talk) 09:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. Note that part of the article matches material from their web site [2]. -- Whpq (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.