Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coral Reef Library
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 10:09, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
nn i just hope libraries are not the next big wiki thing Delete --Aranda56 03:18, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Information would be properly included in the municipality entry. However, some people think there is no "merge" vote, so delete. Geogre 14:44, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and delete is the right thing, and easy to do since the material merged is a single edit by a single author. If the closing sysop does not wish to honor a merge and delete vote, then delete. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Wikipedia is supposed to be a comprehensive attempt at an encyclopedia but it doesn't mean that it should host information on all obscure and irrelevant buildings. --Mecanismo 17:27, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete but as per geogre, merge if not intrepeted as keep. Does not warrant own article. --TimPope 20:50, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge unless the author decides to explain why it needs its own page. Maybe there's a good reason, and it's just stubby... but I don't see any proof. --Jacqui M Schedler 16:20, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.