- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Corey O'Connor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
city politician, does not meet WP:POLITICIAN Gaijin42 (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree that city council membership does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--Rpclod (talk) 01:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- City councillors do not ordinarily pass WP:POLITICIAN except in major metropolitan "world cities" with populations in the millions, and this article is not well-sourced enough to demonstrate that he qualifies as the "exception to the rule". Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete of purely local interest, fails WP:POLITICIAN. I particularly liked the wedding coverage in Pittsburg Magazine. --Bejnar (talk) 07:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Pittsburgh has fewer residents than Mesa, Arizona, and I know no one would argue a Mesa City Counil member would be notable for that fact alone without significant GNG coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - worthy local politician but he fails to pass WP:POLITICIAN and, also, the sources fail to meet WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.