- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Corey Rudl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real evidence of notability. DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is a brief piece online covering the subject's death crash and I did find one book mentioning the subject as a "well-known Internet marketer" ("Digital Engagement" 2009, via Questia). That aside there are several Google Books links to what are effectively ads for his book. Overall I think this is too light to establish biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 06:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Coretheapple (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Poorly sourced, and being the CEO of a company that doesn't have an article is not a particularly compelling claim of notability. No prejudice against future recreation if somebody can actually write and source a better article than this, but this version doesn't demonstrate much actual notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.