- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 01:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Made-up neologism, fails WP:NEO and WP:NFT. Previously prod'ded by User:Matticus78 and removed by author without explanation. Danny Lilithborne 02:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No sources, no google hits. Mdwh 02:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, gamecruft neologism. SM247My Talk 03:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above --IslaySolomon 03:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, non-notable neologism. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Personal neologism. AfD removed by author too. Kevin_b_er 03:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NEO, and admittedly so. --DarkAudit 03:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Since this is admittedly a neologism, can we speedy it or snow it?--Chaser T 03:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Richardcavell 03:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN neologism. Fireplace 04:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- save- what other requirments do i need ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Darth-vader (talk • contribs)
- Have a look at Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms#Articles_on_neologisms.--Chaser T 04:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete I have heard this used, but since games of the genre have mostly died it's probably not worth keeping -- Librarianofages 04:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
save- The word fagging is a type of assault so corner fagging can be a corner assault. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.171.187.37 (talk • contribs)- Huh? Danny Lilithborne 06:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If anything, that makes this a double neologism. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh? Danny Lilithborne 06:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not only this, it's a word to word copy of the geocities site source. --ColourBurst 06:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
save-look again its not a word to word copy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darth-vader (talk • contribs)- Compare this to the Geocities source. Danny Lilithborne 06:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
save-its not a word to word copy as you can see — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darth-vader (talk • contribs)- Delete This term lacks notability, among other failed guidelines. GassyGuy 07:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 13:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --AlexDW 17:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. JChap 20:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --Chris (talk) 00:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism -- Alias Flood 00:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn notable neologism per all the above.--John Lake 03:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.