Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporal Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to lack of reliable sources to establish notability. — TKD::Talk 02:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corporal Robinson

Prod removed. Non-notable indy wrestler, never wrestled in any top promotion. Davnel03 13:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking any reasonable argument of notability or sources that would support such an argument. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think it should stay as he has been very helpful in giving me info to try to keep it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cak666 (talk • contribs) 15:28, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Reply That is not a reason that is supported by Wikipedia policy; it would help if you explained how he meets the notability criteria. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help but echo FisherQueen's comments. It's not like this person has been in WWE, WCW, ECW or TNA, so why do they deserve an article?? Davnel03 18:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is an incredibly ethnocentric statement. --Naha|^(talk) 06:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's unencylopedic and coveres a non-notable wrestler. it should be noted that Cak666 is the main contributor of this article. MPJ-DK 19:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of notability Corpx 19:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Nikki311 03:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.