Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmetic Second

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 01:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmetic Second (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Transwikied and PRODed as a dictionary definition. PROD contested saying it was not a dictinary article, but article contains nothing more than a definition. TexasAndroid (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless someone can establish history of the practice (which seems doubtful, it's too obvious to have a clear history).--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 16:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Dicdef. Jellogirl (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.