Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Railroad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic Railroad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and which is resting entirely on primary sources like their own webpage, their own Facebook, a profile on JamBase and a directory of sound clips on archive.org — no indication of any reliable source coverage has been shown here. As always, a band is not automatically entitled to keep an article on Wikipedia just because they existed — inclusion is governed by the availability of RS coverage which demonstrates that they've passed a notability criterion. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not meet WP:MUSIC. I can only find social media and ticket sales sites. As the article says, they are entirely self-published. If they get picked up by a label AND have a charted hit, then an article makes sense. LaMona (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 03:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.