Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Starcruiser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jack Armstrong (artist)#Cosmic Starcruiser. Sandstein 11:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic Starcruiser

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cosmic Starcruiser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails general notability guideline. Only one reliable source (HuffPost). A Google search did not find any mainstream sources. Only incoming link is from the article on the co-creator. No articles in other Wikipedia languages. This article has similar content to Cosmic Starship which was recently PRODded by Bri and deleted by Liz and was about a similar work by the same artist. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Extensionalism "X". Verbcatcher (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Jack Armstrong (artist) - The sourcing on this art piece is not sufficient to pass the WP:GNG as a stand alone article. The artist's page already discusses it, though, with the one good source from this page already present there, so a Redirect without merge would probably be fine. Rorshacma (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Very short page, and seems promotional. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.