Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike Condition Zero: Source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 14:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Strike Condition Zero: Source (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:CRYSTAL. Appears to be a hoax. Valve has not announced such project. If they have had it would be announced on all gaming sites. SkyWalker (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete (borderline A7) per a lot of things, including lack of verifiable sources, indiscriminate information, WP:NOT#WEBHOST, and as the nom suggested a possible WP:HOAX. Oh yeah, crystalballery. MuZemike (talk) 17:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with extreme prejudice. I don't think its a hoax, but its more than possible—I can't even find an official mod site—but this has to go, no notability, no verifiability, very crystal ball-ish. Not to mention misleading, as the game certainly is not developed by Valve. -- Sabre (talk) 18:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: project fails WP:NOTABILITY and appears to be trying to predict a product not announced yet Cabe6403 (Talk•Please Sign my guest book!) 22:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The sole source, this page on their developer wiki, appears to state that (1) it's being developed by fans, not by Valve, (2) it's nowhere near release, and (3) as such, most of the details on this very article are incorrect, or at least incredibly wishful thinking. Zetawoof_(ζ) 23:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.