Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CounterStrike Promod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CounterStrike Promod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I don't think third-party-mods for CS is notable. Domthedude001 03:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Obviously, nom is correct. Might even have a small problem with WP:CRYSTAL, but that part doesn't really matter. - Rjd0060 03:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Game mods aren't notable. (Unless they've received indep. coverage, which this one hasn't). Bfigura ^(talk) 04:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Counter-Strike started out as a mod, some are notable even if they don't become commercial games. This strikes me more as WP:NFT. Operating 16:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete modcruft. Artw 19:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom & WP:CRYSTAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by M2Ys4U (talk • contribs) 18:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.