Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countin' Carl (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Countin' Carl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

removed PROD per WP:PROD. Reason for PROD by User:Astros4477 was: "Stub article which is an orphan and has no references." Illia Connell (talk) 23:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Nick_Jr._(block)#Former - I'm sure this was an excellent and entertaining show for children but I haven't found any relevant sources despite detailed searches at Google News and Books and a main Google search provided nothing useful or reliable. As mentioned at the first nomination, it is interesting that there isn't an IMDb page but this show was probably so independent and low-budget that it never received much attention. Honestly, several kids shows never receive much attention. Rather than deleting, redirecting may be the better option. SwisterTwister talk 00:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If its existence can't be verified then a redirect would be misleading. Rotten regard 00:30, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources really attest to the fact that it existed; indeed, there appear to be no reliable sources regarding the topic. dci | TALK 03:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing appears to have changed since the previous AfD in 2010... which also voted Delete. Lukeno94 (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because of the lack of reliable sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't know why I say keep, but SwisterTwister has a point. Six Sided Pun Vows (talk | contribs | former account) 18:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First, SwisterTwister didn't vote Keep, but voted Redirect. Second, there's been no evidence anywhere this show actually exists/existed - and that's an identical concern to the one the previous AfD had 2 years ago! Lukeno94 (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, same reason as last time: apparently doesn't actually exist. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It existed, there are some archived videos online, but that doesn't make it notable. I vaguely remember these shorts and they were just that shorts. Not notable. Not even worth a redirect. RadioFan (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable interstitial program, too obscure to redirect. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 09:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.