Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coupland Digital Music Synthesizer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Nomination withdrawn (changed from neutral to keep). Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 00:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coupland Digital Music Synthesizer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article in itself does not seem to be bad, but it completely lacks any sources, and hence fails WP:NN. It has been tagged with "notability" since September 06, but without any improvement. Thus I am sending it to the AfD now. If, however, somebody is able to provide sources during the AfD process, so much the better. Neutral. -- Sent here as part of the Notability Wikiproject -- B. Wolterding 17:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Sources?
  • Mark Vail (2000). Vintage Synthesizers: pioneering designers, groundbreaking instruments, collecting tips, mutants ... Backbeat Books. pp. 83–84. ISBN 0879306033.
  • "Products of Interest: Micor Inc. Coupland Digital Synthesizer". Computer Music Journal. 2 (1): 64–66. Spring 1978.
  • Stephan Dargel (1995). "COUPLAND". Synrise (in German). Dariprint Softworks.
  • L.L. De Mars. "Coupland". Synthèse et synchronisation de la musique électronique (in French).
• Always search for sources yourself before nominating an article at AFD on grounds of notability. Uncle G 18:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, I am changing to Keep myself, given these improvements. --B. Wolterding 19:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.