- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Craig Benjamin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Not-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I second the opinion, fails WP:NOTE Tashif (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now. He is an up and coming tenure-track professor, but is not yet notable even according to our general guidelines. Wikipedia is not the place to wage tenure fights and other battles in academia. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I share the above expressed concerns. For what it's worth, I found nothing on GaleNet. Dlohcierekim 18:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Bearian. Asteroid1717 (talk) 00:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.