Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crapware (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by JzG. With edit summary that makes us look very unprofessional. W.marsh 14:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
WP:NOT#DICTIONARY, and WP:NOR. Captain panda 04:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete amusing but not encyclopedic. JuJube 04:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Again, per NEO or DICT. - Rjd0060 04:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. It's a valid slang term that I've used, generally in the context of spyware or adware, and turns up nearly half a million hits on Google, but I can't see the article ever being more than a dictionary definition of the word, so not appropriate here per WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. I don't really see the OR that the nom is commenting on, though. Neil916 (Talk) 08:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Firefox?Delete obviously. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 08:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Transwiki to Wiktionary per above comment by Neil916. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 20:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary, unless enough content can be added to make this an encyclopedic subject. At present it's just a dictdef, and the first several pages of non-wiki ghits don't give solid sources for expansion. --Fabrictramp 21:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.