Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Create Synchronicity
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Create Synchronicity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Borderline notability, and the primary contributor is the author of the software. (The article had been tagged for external links cleanup since May of 2010; I cleaned out the promotional external links, but I'm not sure if the article itself should stick around.) rahaeli (talk) 05:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: from the references already in article I can't see even borderline notability. All that I could find off-site are The Best Free Software of 2011 from PC Mag (although it doesn't actually contribute to subject's notability: being 18th out of 208 is not too much of accomplishment, not to mention that there were similar lists for other years) and full length DIY: Free Windows backup tool Synchronicity HowTo-style article by TechRepublic. Blog post, albeit in reputable collective blog, and entry in Best N of year Y do not satisfy WP:GNG requirements. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:N -- RoySmith (talk) 21:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.