Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creating Rem Lezar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Rem Lezar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems to exist, but that is all one can say about it. Drmies (talk) 23:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notabbility. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - The article makes a case for notability based on the "viral" popularity of the video. A google search reveals a lot of blogs about it. Most of them are probably not reliable sources, but they are clearly independent of the creators Puddytang (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment' - That just means it is a passing fancy. Tons of things have a temporry blip of popularity, but that doesn't denote notability. -- Whpq (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blogs are not reliable sources unless they are written by reputable people. I see nothing but unreliable sources. No hits on Gnews, only directory listings on Gbooks. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unable to find anything more than trivial coverage in independent reliable sources. ^Bongo_matic 15:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.