Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Developer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Brandon (talk) 08:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Creative Developer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Recently coined job title. Problem is, the person who is claimed to have coined the term is also the article's creator, and no actual usage is asserted. By the way, I would like to know whether there's any company out there that expects its developers to not be creative. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Seems similar to Creative services (also unsourced), im not so sure this is notable and even if it were we would need a re-write. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are a few uses of this title out there; the problem is, no two of them seem to mean the same thing, even in the same industry, and thus this entry could just as easily be wrong as right. There's certainly nothing I could find that backs up this particular usage except self-created references to/by the article's creator. Probably more suitable for Wiktionary and/or Urban Dictionary but since there's no widely-agreed-upon definition, I wouldn't recommend transwiki-ing. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable neologism. The COI doesn't help things, and as the nominator says, it is slightly hard to imagine the term catching on since it appears to be slightly redundant. Bfigura (talk) 03:53, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is reminiscent of a WP:DICDEF, and a very confusing one at that. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Software Engineer. Even by the user's own definition, it's just a smart Software Engineer.--TParis00ap (talk) 14:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism and veiled self-promotion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.