Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Environmental Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Environmental Networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct company (acquired by Climate Energy which does not have its own wikipage) which does not meet WP:CORP. No independent media coverage other than trivia or reporting the acquisition. Beagel (talk) 11:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's one source in the article that appears to be reliable (it's unlinked, so unable to assess it), but source searches are not providing additional sources that provide significant coverage (sigcov). Gbooks searches are only providing mentions (e.g. [1], [2], [3]), and news searches are likewise not providing the sigcov needed to pass WP:N. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.