Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creativity and survival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 01:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creativity and survival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article prodded but PROD taken down by editor who created this. WP:NOTESSAY and WP:OR are two valid reasons for this to be deleted. ...William 21:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Original research. Should be CSD'd as a non-encyclopedic article. reddogsix (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wish we could CSD stuff like this. There should be a new criterion. I was the one who initially PRODded this, my rationale is on the PROD (see the article's page history). --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 22:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Pure OR. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 23:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per all the above. Essay, original research, simply not an encyclopedia article. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. bd2412 T 18:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.