Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creatures of Destiny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Creatures of Destiny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sufficiently notable. The references provided (IMDb, director's own website, Amazon listing) do not constitute in-depth third-party coverage and I have been unable to find anything significant online. Pichpich (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a search and there's zero independent and reliable coverage of this film. Other than this wikipedia entry, all of the coverage is primary or through sources that wouldn't be considered reliable. This is just one of many articles that forms a walled garden around the director and smacks of COI, as I have reason to believe that the original editor either is the director or is someone involved in the production of the films.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲‍水 10:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no independent coverage that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.