Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crendon Replicas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crendon Replicas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Crendon Replicas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of too many articles created by the same editor. I cannot see a company that has produced about 100 car kits as notable. No significant sources provided, I do not consider trade lists as proving notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I didn't find reliable sources to help the page remain published on Wikipedia per WP:ORG 美しい歌 (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.