- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Crewdate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD, Neologism
Sources mentioned in the article are from studentforums and studentpapers and only use the term and are not about them. No reliable third party sources mention this term. 137 Ghits [1], non reliable. Erebus Morgaine (talk) 19:17, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 09:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's now even a website for organizing them: http://CrewDates.com. This should remove the objections, I believe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsramek (talk • contribs) 08:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Website is a primary source, and are again just using the term, not discussing it. This is a non-notable local neologism.Yobmod (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Yobmod and nom. MvjsTalking 10:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.