- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -R. fiend 04:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
nn chatroom...only 10 people at a time.. :/ there are a millions of IRC chatrooms like that. Delete. -- SoothingR 12:41, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. utcursch | talk 13:02, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
well yes, IRC chatrooms with 10 people are common place... but from what I understand, #cricketchat boasts the likes of prominent cricket writers Thomas Rose, Steve Thompson and Chris Weston - all of which write for the popular website Cricket-Online. That in itself makes the chatroom unique, does it not?
- Keep Well worth an entry, home of influential cricket writers. --Doctor Treb 14:02, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I get a few hundred hits on Google for "Cricketchat". Hard to see how it can be influential and so untalked about. (Don't exactly overload on Chris Weston et al either!) Happy to be proven wrong! Marcus22 14:43, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn and vanity. even if it is kept, it needs to be rewritten because right now it is hardly encyclopedic.--Alhutch 15:38, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. Dottore So 07:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the website and the writers deserve an entry, but there's really not much to say about an IRC channel. If it has to be kept, mention it in the article on the website it's attached to (if we have it). - Mgm|(talk) 09:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Marcus22. Xoloz 10:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.